Article Text
Abstract
Since Bennett, Draper, and Frith published a paper in this journal in 2000 considering the possible criminalisation of HIV transmission, an important legal development has taken place. February 2001 saw the first successful United Kingdom prosecution for the sexual transmission of disease for over a century, when Stephen Kelly was convicted in Glasgow of recklessly injuring his former girlfriend by infecting her with HIV. Whether English criminal law (as opposed to Scots law) can apply criminal penalties in such a case, however, still remains uncertain.
This paper, in addition to providing some background to the Kelly case, briefly explores the current possibilities for prosecution under English law. It then proceeds to outline and comment on the issues relevant to criminalisation, responding in part to points made by Bennett, Draper, and Frith and also by Bird and Leigh Brown in a recent article in the British Medical Journal.
- HIV
- duty to warn
- enforcing obligation
- infectious disease
- criminalisation
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- The criminalisation of HIV transmission
- Ignorance is bliss? HIV and moral duties and legal duties to forewarn
- HIV transmission law in the age of treatment-as-prevention
- ‘The intention may not be cruel… but the impact may be’: understanding legislators’ motives and wider public attitudes to a draft HIV Bill in Malawi
- How can the criminal law support the provision of quality in healthcare?
- Criminalisation of HIV transmission: implications for public health in Scotland
- Healthcare scandals in the NHS: crime and punishment
- Maternal transmission of HIV infection: a crime against my child?
- Abortion pills: under whose control?
- Criminalisation of unintentional error in healthcare in the UK: a perspective from New Zealand