Article Text
Original Article
Thomson, the right to life, and partial birth abortion or two MULES for Sister Sarah
Abstract
In this paper, I argue that Thomson's famous attempt to reconcile the fetus's putative right to life with robust abortion rights is not tenable. Given her view, whether or not an abortion violates the fetus's right to life depends on the abortion procedure utilised. And I argue that Thomson's view implies that any late term abortion that involves feticide is impermissible. In particular, this would rule out the partial birth abortion technique which has been so controversial of late.
- abortion
- feticide
- right to life
- bodily rights
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
-
↵* Machines Used for Life Support
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- The pearl of the ‘Pro-Life’ movement? Reflections on the Kermit Gosnell controversy
- Is current practice around late termination of pregnancy eugenic and discriminatory? Maternal interests and abortion
- Is there a ‘new ethics of abortion’?
- Dilemma for appeals to the moral significance of birth
- Critical notice—Defending life: a moral and legal case against abortion choice by Francis J Beckwith
- Yes, the baby should live: a pro-choice response to Giubilini and Minerva
- Abortion and Ectogenesis: Moral Compromise
- After-birth and before-birth personhood: why the baby should live
- Abortion, infanticide and moral context
- Issues for service providers: a response to points raised