Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Supererogation and altruism: a comment
  1. R S Downie
  1. Correspondence to:
 Professor R S Downie, Department of Philosophy, Glasgow University, Glasgow G12 8QQ, Scotland;
 R.Downie{at}philosophy.arts.gla.ac.uk

Abstract

Supererogation can be distinguished from altruism, in that the former is located in the category of duty but exceeds the strict requirements of duty, whereas altruism belongs to a different moral category from duty. It follows that doctors do not act altruistically in their professional roles. Individual doctors may sometimes show supererogation, but supererogation is not a necessary feature of the medical profession. The aim of medicine is to act in the best interests of patients. This aim involves neither supererogation nor even the moral quality of beneficence. It is simply a job description. Morality enters medicine through the quality of the individual doctor's work, not by the definition of that work.

  • Altruism
  • beneficence
  • medical aims
  • professions
  • supererogation

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes