Article Text
Abstract
There is a growing belief in the US that medicine is an altruistic profession, and that physicians display altruism in their daily work. We argue that one of the most fundamental features of medical professionalism is a fiduciary responsibility to patients, which implies a duty or obligation to act in patients' best medical interests. The term that best captures this sense of obligation is “beneficence”, which contrasts with “altruism” because the latter act is supererogatory and is beyond obligation. On the other hand, we offer several examples in which patients act altruistically. If it is patients and not the doctors who are altruistic, then the patients are the gift-bearers and to that extent doctors owe them gratitude and respect for their many contributions to medicine. Recognising this might help us better understand the moral significance of the doctor-patient relationship in modern medicine.
- Altruism
- beneficence
- duty
- doctor-patient relationship
- professionalism
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- and altruism: a comment
- Drawing the line in clinical treatment of companion animals: recommendations from an ethics working party
- Value promotion as a goal of medicine
- Conscientious commitment, professional obligations and abortion provision after the reversal of Roe v Wade
- Ethical dilemmas encountered by small animal veterinarians: characterisation, responses, consequences and beliefs regarding euthanasia
- Why I wrote my advance decision to refuse life-prolonging treatment: and why the law on sanctity of life remains problematic
- A plea for end-of-life discussions with patients suffering from Huntington's disease: the role of the physician
- Absent virtues: the poacher becomes gamekeeper
- Doctors during the COVID-19 pandemic: what are their duties and what is owed to them?
- Caring for risky patients: duty or virtue?