Article info
PDFCurrent controversy
The Perruche judgment and the “right not to be born”
Citation
The Perruche judgment and the “right not to be born”
Publication history
- First published April 1, 2002.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Copyright 2002 by the Journals of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- Hostile environments? Down’s syndrome and genetic screening in contemporary culture
- Medical paternalism and the fetus
- Disability and narrative: new directions for medicine and the medical humanities
- Preserving women’s reproductive autonomy while promoting the rights of people with disabilities?: the case of Heidi Crowter and Maire Lea-Wilson in the light of NIPT debates in England, France and Germany
- Is there a ‘new ethics of abortion’?
- Prenatal diagnosis and selective abortion: a result of the cultural turn?
- Is there a “right not to be born”? Reproductive decision making, options and the right to information
- Expressivism at the beginning and end of life
- A legacy of silence: the intersections of medical sociology and disability studies
- Investigation of a cluster of children with Down's syndrome born to mothers who had attended a school in Dundalk, Ireland