Article Text
Statistics from Altmetric.com
T Russell. Ashgate, 2000, £40.00, pp 183. ISBN 0 7546 1210 4
It is more than thirty years since the Harvard report, A Definition of Irreversible Coma, and twenty-five years since the UK Royal Colleges' criteria for the diagnosis of brain death, Diagnosis of Brain Death, provoked passionate public debate. For many years now, however, the concept has been well accepted by the public, and the practicalities of its use by the medical profession. According to a recent American book, however, some academic philosophers are concerned that the pragmatism of the doctors and the acceptance of the public has led too readily to acceptance of incoherent concepts and they would like to reignite controversy. The present book also argues that current concepts of brain death are conceptually inadequate and claims to present an entirely …
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Brain death revisited: it is not ‘complete death’ according to Islamic sources
- Consent to testing for brain death
- On the ethical permissibility of in situ reperfusion in cardiac transplantation after the declaration of circulatory death
- Death, dying and donation: organ transplantation and the diagnosis of death
- Reply to: Defining death: when physicians and families differ
- Is there a place for CPR and sustained physiological support in brain-dead non-donors?
- Do the ‘brain dead’ merely appear to be alive?
- Decapitation and the definition of death
- Confirmation of brainstem death
- Depictions of ‘brain death’ in the media: medical and ethical implications