Article Text
Debate
Reply to Brassington
Abstract
I thank Brassington for his reply, especially for stating “that there is rather a lot going for Szasz's argument, and I agree broadly with the conclusion”. In further support of my thesis regarding the fictitious nature of mental illness as a disease similar to diseases of bodily organs, I add the reminder that, prior to the sixteenth century, the word “mind” meant only minding. The birth of the concept of mind as an entity and of the term “mind” as a noun is the symptom of the metamorphosis of the mediaeval, religious view of the world into the modern, scientific view of it.
- Cause
- freedom of choice
- mind
- mental illness
- reason
- responsibility
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- The effect of semantic and emotional context on written recall for verbal language in high functioning adults with autism spectrum disorder
- Duke University School of Medicine Names Vice Dean for Clinical Research
- Isolated theory of mind deficits and risk for frontotemporal dementia: a longitudinal pilot study
- Theory of mind in behavioural-variant frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer's disease: a meta-analysis
- NIH Appoints New Council of Councils Members
- Impaired social cognition in multiple sclerosis
- In two minds: executive functioning versus theory of mind in behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia
- 2014 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine
- Impaired affective and cognitive theory of mind and behavioural change in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
- British Neuropsychiatry Association 21st Annual General Meeting