Article Text
Statistics from Altmetric.com
L Grayson. The British Library, 2000, £35, pp 300. ISBN 071230858X
The use of animals for the purpose of scientific research is an emotive subject. The moral arguments often exhibit polarised positions: the scientific demand for absolute freedom of research, and the abolitionist demand for a total ban on all animal experiments. At one extreme are those who argue that research on animals is essential in the battle against disease, and on the other extreme it is argued that the cost in terms of animal suffering is too high and that if experiments were prohibited medical researchers would find some other means of ensuring scientific progress. The rhetoric employed is also suggestive of a polarity: experimenters are accused of cruelty and indifference, whereas campaigners on behalf of animals are accused of irresponsibility and insensitivity towards the wellbeing of humans. Yet to ask …
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Animal research nexus: a new approach to the connections between science, health and animal welfare
- Reforming the politics of animal research
- Is there a place for animal experiments?
- Different views on ethics: how animal ethics is situated in a committee culture
- Is it acceptable to use animals to model obese humans? A critical discussion of two arguments against the use of animals in obesity research
- Trends in animal use at US research facilities
- Knowledge and opinions of veterinary students in Italy toward animal welfare science and law
- One Health and paradigms of public biobanking
- Support for use of animals in research
- Researchers commit to greater openness on research involving animals in the UK