Article info
PDFReviewers
Thank you to the journal's assessors
Citation
Thank you to the journal's assessors
Publication history
- First published February 1, 2002.
Online issue publication
February 01, 2002
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Copyright 2002 by the Journals of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- Journal editors’ perspectives on the communication practices in biomedical journals: a qualitative study
- Journal editors’ perspectives on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in biomedical journals: a qualitative study
- Is a one-size-fits-all ‘12-month rule’ appropriate when it comes to the last search date in systematic reviews?
- Reporting guidance considerations from a statistical perspective: overview of tools to enhance the rigour of reporting of randomised trials and systematic reviews
- “Hardly worth the effort”? Medical journals’ policies and their editors’ and publishers’ views on trial registration and publication bias: quantitative and qualitative study
- A scoping review protocol on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in the manuscript review process in biomedical journals
- What makes the best medical ethics journal? A North American perspective
- Addressing power imbalances in global health: Pre-Publication Support Services (PREPSS) for authors in low-income and middle-income countries
- A comparison of journal instructions regarding institutional review board approval and conflict-of-interest disclosure between 1995 and 2005
- The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews