Article Text
PDFReviewers
Thank you to the journal's assessors
Statistics from Altmetric.com
We wish to thank the …
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Journal editors’ perspectives on the communication practices in biomedical journals: a qualitative study
- Journal editors’ perspectives on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in biomedical journals: a qualitative study
- Is a one-size-fits-all ‘12-month rule’ appropriate when it comes to the last search date in systematic reviews?
- Reporting guidance considerations from a statistical perspective: overview of tools to enhance the rigour of reporting of randomised trials and systematic reviews
- “Hardly worth the effort”? Medical journals’ policies and their editors’ and publishers’ views on trial registration and publication bias: quantitative and qualitative study
- A scoping review protocol on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in the manuscript review process in biomedical journals
- What makes the best medical ethics journal? A North American perspective
- Addressing power imbalances in global health: Pre-Publication Support Services (PREPSS) for authors in low-income and middle-income countries
- A comparison of journal instructions regarding institutional review board approval and conflict-of-interest disclosure between 1995 and 2005
- Science journal editors’ views on publication ethics: results of an international survey