Article Text
Abstract
It remains unclear what patient advocacy actually entails and what values it ought to embody. It will be useful to ascertain whether advocacy means supporting any decision the patient makes, or if the advocate can claim to represent the patient by asserting well-intentioned paternalistic claims on the patient's behalf. This is especially significant because the position of advocate brings with it certain privileges on the basis of of presumed insight into patient-perceived interests, namely, entitlement to take part in clinical decision making and increased professional standing. Three issues related to patient advocacy will be explored: are patient advocates necessary; what does advocacy entail, and who ought to represent patients in this way—arguments for and against prospective candidates will also be covered. The paper considers whether advocates are necessary since not only can they be dangerously paternalistic, but the salutary values advocacy embodies are already part of good professional health care.
- Advocacy
- paternalism
- patient perceptions
- representation
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Request Permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information:
Other content recommended for you
- Guideline for obtaining valid consent for gastrointestinal endoscopy procedures
- Ethical dilemmas encountered by small animal veterinarians: characterisation, responses, consequences and beliefs regarding euthanasia
- Nursing in asylum seeker detention in Australia: care, rights and witnessing
- Is providing elective ventilation in the best interests of potential donors?
- Just allocation and team loyalty: a new virtue ethic for emergency medicine
- Patient safety and the ageing physician: a qualitative study of key stakeholder attitudes and experiences
- Survivor advocacy: I speak for those who can’t
- It is never lawful or ethical to withdraw life-sustaining treatment from patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness
- Drawing the line in clinical treatment of companion animals: recommendations from an ethics working party
- Improving quality in hospital end-of-life care: honest communication, compassion and empathy