Article info
PDFOriginal Article
Rationing, randomising, and researching in health care provision
- Correspondence to: Sarah J L Edwards, Centre for Ethics in Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK; sarah.edwards{at}bristol.ac.uk
Citation
Rationing, randomising, and researching in health care provision
Publication history
- Accepted July 13, 2001
- Revised July 12, 2001
- First published February 1, 2002.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Copyright 2002 by the Journals of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- Reflective disequilibrium: a critical evaluation of the complete lives framework for healthcare rationing
- How can bedside rationing be justified despite coexisting inefficiency? The need for ‘benchmarks of efficiency’
- Randomised placebo-controlled trials of surgery: ethical analysis and guidelines
- A fair share for the orphans: ethical guidelines for a fair distribution of resources within the bounds of the 10-year-old European Orphan Drug Regulation
- Three pitfalls of accountable healthcare rationing
- Randomisation and resource allocation: a missed opportunity for evaluating health care and social interventions
- The battering of informed consent
- Doctors’ perceptions of how resource limitations relate to futility in end-of-life decision making: a qualitative analysis
- What is it to do good ethics?
- What sort of bioethical values are the evidence-based medicine and the GRADE approaches willing to deal with?