Article Text
Abstract
The issue of abortion has evolved since 1967. In this paper, the shift in the discourses of abortion are discussed. The article suggests that abortion is used as a “back-up” method of family planning and that this is broadly acceptable. Although there is little public opposition to abortion as such, there are influences that undermine abortion provision as it now exists. Growing concern about the status of the fetus shapes a number of debates. For example the issue of what the fetus feels during abortion influences abortion practice. Advances in technology and the increase in knowledge about the unborn fetus will not change a woman's decision about having a late termination. The article concludes with the idea that a woman is a moral, civilised human being that deserves the right to make decisions about her reproductive life.
- Abortion
- fetus
- women
- pregnancy
- perspective
- moral
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
-
Ann Furedi is Director of Communications at British Pregnancy Advisory Service (BPAS), London.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- US Senate outlaws “partial birth abortion”
- Is current practice around late termination of pregnancy eugenic and discriminatory? Maternal interests and abortion
- US senate likely to ban controversial abortion procedure
- The pearl of the ‘Pro-Life’ movement? Reflections on the Kermit Gosnell controversy
- The new ethics of abortion
- US judge says ban on partial birth abortion is unconstitutional
- Dilemma for appeals to the moral significance of birth
- Infanticide and moral consistency
- Birth, meaningful viability and abortion
- After 50 years of legal abortion in Great Britain, calls grow for further liberalisation