Article Text
Abstract
Objectives—To assess the process involved in obtaining ethical approval for a single-centre study involving geographically dispersed subjects with an uncommon genetic disorder.
Design—Observational data of the application process to 53 local research ethics committees (LRECs) throughout Wales, England and Scotland. The Multicentre Research Ethics Committee (MREC) for Wales had already granted approval.
Results—Application to the 53 LRECs required 24,552 sheets of paper and took two months of the researcher's time. The median time taken for approval was 39 days with only seven (13%) of committees responding within the recommended 21 days. In at least nineteen cases (36%) a subcommittee considered the application. Thirty-three committees (62%) accepted the proposal without amendments but, of the remainder, four (8%) requested changes outside of the remit of LRECs.
Discussion—Difficulties still exist with the system for obtaining ethical approval for studies involving a single centre but with patients at multiple sites, as is often required for genetic observational research. As such studies differ from true multicentre studies, it may be advantageous to develop a separate and specific process of application to ensure that resources are not unnecessarily expended in the quest for ethical approval.
- Research ethics
- MREC
- LREC
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Non-commercial clinical trials of a medicinal product: can they survive the current process of research approvals in the UK?
- The new system of review by multicentre research ethics committees: prospective study
- Meeting the challenges facing research ethics committees: some practical suggestions
- What are local issues? The problem of the local review of research
- Impact of recent legislative bills regarding clinical research on Italian ethics committee activity
- Should local research ethics committees monitor research they have approved?
- Multicentre research ethics committees: has the cure been worse than the disease?
- New governance arrangements for research ethics committees: is facilitating research achieved at the cost of participants’ interest
- The ESRC research ethics framework and research ethics review at UK universities: rebuilding the Tower of Babel REC by REC
- Bureaucracy of ethics applications