Article info
PDFResearch ethics
A survey of newly appointed consultants' attitudes towards research fraud
Citation
A survey of newly appointed consultants' attitudes towards research fraud
Publication history
- First published October 1, 2001.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Copyright 2001 by the Journal of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- Research integrity: we are all accountable
- Neutralising fair credit: factors that influence unethical authorship practices
- Bad behaviour does not equal research fraud
- Scientific misconduct from the perspective of research coordinators: a national survey
- Should research fraud be a crime?
- Retractions in the scientific literature: do authors deliberately commit research fraud?
- Whistleblowing in academic medicine
- Dealing with scientific misconduct
- Why unethical papers should be retracted
- The White Bull effect: abusive coauthorship and publication parasitism