Article info
PDFClinical ethics
Decisions Relating to Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: commentary 3: Degrading lives?
Citation
Decisions Relating to Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: commentary 3: Degrading lives?
Publication history
- First published October 1, 2001.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Copyright 2001 by the Journal of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- Making a case for the inclusion of refractory and severe mental illness as a sole criterion for Canadians requesting medical assistance in dying (MAiD): a review
- Mrs Pretty and Ms B
- Canadian French and English newspapers’ portrayals of physicians’ role and medical assistance in dying (MAiD) from 1972 to 2016: a qualitative textual analysis
- Words matter: ‘enduring intolerable suffering’ and the provider-side peril of Medical Assistance in Dying in Canada
- Organ donation after medical assistance in dying or cessation of life-sustaining treatment requested by conscious patients: the Canadian context
- Impact of medical assistance in dying (MAiD) on family caregivers
- Medical Assistance in Dying at a paediatric hospital
- ‘How is it possible that at times we can be physicians and at times assistants in suicide?’ Attitudes and experiences of palliative care physicians in respect of the current legal situation of suicide assistance in Switzerland
- Social determinants of health and slippery slopes in assisted dying debates: lessons from Canada
- Canadian neurosurgeons’ views on medical assistance in dying (MAID): a cross-sectional survey of Canadian Neurosurgical Society (CNSS) members