Article info
Clinical ethics
Decisions Relating to Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: a joint statement from the British Medical Association, the Resuscitation Council (UK) and the Royal College of Nursing
Citation
Decisions Relating to Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: a joint statement from the British Medical Association, the Resuscitation Council (UK) and the Royal College of Nursing
Publication history
- First published October 1, 2001.
Online issue publication
October 01, 2001
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Copyright 2001 by the Journal of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- Variation in local trust Do Not Attempt Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (DNACPR) policies: a review of 48 English healthcare trusts
- Association of medical futility with do-not-resuscitate (DNR) code status in hospitalised patients
- Professional guidelines on Decisions Relating to Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: introduction
- Factors that influence decisions about cardiopulmonary resuscitation: the views of doctors and medical students
- ‘Do Not Attempt Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation’ discussions at the point of discharge: a case note review of hospice practice following local integrated policy implementation
- CPR decision-making conversations in the UK: an integrative review
- Ethics briefing
- Quality of life after in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation for patients over the age of 80 years
- Ethical issues surrounding do not attempt resuscitation orders: decisions, discussions and deleterious effects
- Family members, ambulance clinicians and attempting CPR in the community: the ethical and legal imperative to reach collaborative consensus at speed