Article Text
Abstract
In physics, we use the same laws to explain why airplanes fly, and why they crash. In psychiatry, we use one set of laws to explain sane behaviour, which we attribute to reasons (choices), and another set of laws to explain insane behaviour, which we attribute to causes (diseases). God, man's idea of moral perfection, judges human deeds without distinguishing between sane persons responsible for their behaviour and insane persons deserving to be excused for their evil deeds. It is hubris to pretend that the insanity defence is compassionate, just, or scientific. Mental illness is to psychiatry as phlogiston was to chemistry. Establishing chemistry as a science of the nature of matter required the recognition of the non-existence of phlogiston. Establishing psychiatry as a science of the nature of human behaviour requires the recognition of the non-existence of mental illness.
- Agency
- alchemy
- behaviour
- cause
- chemistry
- dignity
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
-
Thomas Szasz, MD, is Professor of Psychiatry Emeritus, Upstate Medical University, State University of New York, Syracuse, New York, USA.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- “Idiots, infants, and the insane”: mental illness and legal incompetence
- ‘The few cubic centimetres inside your skull’: a neurological reading of George Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four
- Familial, psychiatric, and socioeconomic risk factors for suicide in young people: nested case-control study
- Actions, causes, and psychiatry: a reply to Szasz
- Doubting Thomas
- Thomas Szasz
- When psychiatric diagnosis becomes an overworked tool
- Creativity, self creation, and the treatment of mental illness
- Socioeconomic position at the age of 30 and the later risk of a mental disorder: a nationwide population-based register study
- Reply to Brassington