Article Text
Abstract
Physicians have an ethical responsibility to their patients to offer the best available medical care. This responsibility conflicts with their role as gatekeepers of the limited health care resources available for all patients collectively. It is ethically untenable to expect doctors to face this trade-off during each patient encounter; the physician cannot be expected to compromise the wellbeing of the patient in the office in favour of anonymous patients elsewhere. Hence, as in other domains of public policy where individual and collective interests conflict, some form of collective solution is required. Collective solutions may take the form of placing explicit resource constraints on resources available to physicians, or clinical practice guidelines that recognise cost-effective care as acceptable. Such solutions will be politically and ethically sustainable only if patients as citizens of the larger population accept the need for rationing of limited resources in health care.
- Resource allocation
- physician-patient relationship
- cost-effectiveness
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
-
Milton C Weinstein, PhD, is Director of the Program on the Economic Evaluation of Medical Technology, Center for Risk Analysis, School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Once-weekly semaglutide for patients with type 2 diabetes: a cost-effectiveness analysis in the Netherlands
- Health professionals have an ethical duty . . .
- Impact of missed treatment opportunities on outcomes in hospitalised patients with heart failure
- Cost-effectiveness of percutaneous coronary intervention versus bypass surgery from a Dutch perspective
- Economic evaluation alongside randomised controlled trials: design, conduct, analysis, and reporting
- Cost effectiveness analysis of improved blood pressure control in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes: UKPDS 40
- Training care givers of stroke patients: economic evaluation
- Randomised trial to evaluate the effectiveness and impact of offering postvisit decision support and assistance in obtaining physician-recommended colorectal cancer screening: the e-assist: Colon Health study—a protocol study
- Effect of preventive primary care outreach on health related quality of life among older adults at risk of functional decline: randomised controlled trial
- National Institute for Health and Care Excellence clinical guidelines development principles and processes