Article Text
Abstract
If we cross-classify the absolutist-consequentialist distinction with an intuitive-analytical one we can see that economists probably attract the hostility of those in the other three cells as a result of being analytical consequentialists, as much as because of their concern with “costs”. Suggesting that some sources of utility (either “outcome” or “process” in origin) are to be regarded as rights cannot, says the analytical consequentialist, overcome the fact that fulfilling and respecting rights is a resource-consuming activity, one that will inevitably have consequences, in resource-constrained situations, for the fulfilment of the rights of others. Within the analytical consequentialist framework QALY-type measures of health outcome have the unique advantage of allowing technical and allocative efficiency to be addressed simultaneously, while differential weighting of QALYs accruing to different groups means that efficiency and equity can be merged into the necessary single maximand. But what if such key concepts of the analytical consequentialist are not part of the discursive equipment of others? Are they to be disqualified from using them on this ground? Is it ethical for intuition to be privileged in ethical discourse, or is the analyst entitled to “equal opportunities” in the face of “analysisism”, the cognitive equivalent of “racism” and “sexism”?
- Health economics
- utility
- analysisism
- rights
- QALY
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
-
Jack Dowie is Professor of Health Impact Analysis at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Cost effectiveness analysis in health care: contraindications
- Health economic evaluation
- Economic evaluation of mental health interventions: an introduction to cost-utility analysis
- An introduction to economic evaluation
- Health system modelling research: towards a whole-health-system perspective for identifying good value for money investments in health system strengthening
- Health systems efficiency in China and ASEAN, 2015–2020: a DEA-Tobit and SFA analysis application
- Technical and scale efficiency of provincial health systems in China: a bootstrapping data envelopment analysis
- Definitions of efficiency
- Quality-adjusted life years
- Technical and scale efficiency in the delivery of child health services in Zambia: results from data envelopment analysis