Article Text
Abstract
This editorial provides a review of the current ways in which health economics is impacting on policy and reviews some of the key ethical and value-judgmental issues that commonly arise in and as a result of the work of economists. It also briefly highlights the contributions of the authors of this special issue of the journal, all of which illustrate how economists have approached ethical issues in health service policy (both in its financing and its delivery), and some of which explore the major methodological matters that arise and go on to discuss their potential as sources of conflict or harmony with other approaches to the same questions.
- Health economics
- value judgments
- resource allocation
- ethics
- QALYs
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
-
Anthony J Culyer is Professor of Economics, Department of Economics & Related Subjects, University of York, Heslington, York.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Not a NICE fallacy: a reply to Dr Quigley
- Wickedness or folly? The ethics of NICE’s decisions
- National Institute for Clinical Excellence and its value judgments
- Research ethics and evidence based medicine
- Justice and the NICE approach
- Value assessment frameworks: who is valuing the care in healthcare?
- Is an ounce of prevention worth a pound of cure? A cross-sectional study of the impact of English public health grant on mortality and morbidity
- Does NICE apply the rule of rescue in its approach to highly specialised technologies?
- It’s not NICE to discriminate
- All health is not equal: the use of modifiers in NICE technology appraisal