Article Text
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Linda F Hogle, New Brunswick, Rutgers University Press, 1999, 241 pages, US$22.00 (pb).
Drawing upon the disciplines of bioethics, anthropology and politics, Linda F Hogle examines the use of human body parts for transplantation and research in modern Germany. She focuses on German attitudes to organ transplantation and the fears expressed by doctors and the public regarding utilitarian justification of the use of body parts taken from the vulnerable to benefit others.
In modern Germany, argues Hogle, organ transplantation and practices relating to the use of human body parts have developed under the shadow of the history of medicine during National Socialism. This can be seen in the recent controversy over brain death, where the spectre of “lives not worth living” has been invoked in the context of decisions to declare death and authorise removal of body parts. Ethical tensions were …
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Is informed consent required for the diagnosis of brain death regardless of consent for organ donation?
- Brain death revisited: it is not ‘complete death’ according to Islamic sources
- Individual choice in the definition of death
- Consent to testing for brain death
- Death, dying and donation: organ transplantation and the diagnosis of death
- A narrative review of the empirical evidence on public attitudes on brain death and vital organ transplantation: the need for better data to inform policy
- N18 in median somatosensory evoked potentials: a new indicator of medullary function useful for the diagnosis of brain death
- Proceeding with clinical trials of animal to human organ transplantation: a way out of the dilemma
- Residual vasomotor activity assessed by heart rate variability in a brain-dead case
- A long shadow: Nazi doctors, moral vulnerability and contemporary medical culture