Article Text
Filler
Measuring quality of life
Statistics from Altmetric.com
sir
Ravenscroft and Bell's study of end-of-life decision making in intensive care1 provides valuable evidence for further debate about this ultimate and often subjective, aspect of practice. However, the comment that belated or absent measurement of Quality of Life is “clearly inadequate” ignores the contentious nature of measuring Quality of Life. Another recent review2 concludes that Quality of Life cannot be measured either accurately or reliably, and so should not be used as a criterion for health care services.
References
Other content recommended for you
- ‘Reframing Healthcare Services through the Lens of Co-Production’ (RheLaunCh): a study protocol for a mixed methods evaluation of mechanisms by which healthcare and social services impact the health and well-being of patients with COPD and CHF in the USA and The Netherlands
- COVID-19 health and social care access for autistic people: European policy review
- Making decisions to limit treatment in life-limiting and life-threatening conditions in children: a framework for practice
- AFMR Southern Regional Meeting Abstracts
- Association between palliative care and healthcare outcomes among adults with terminal non-cancer illness: population based matched cohort study
- Western Regional Meeting 2016, Carmel, California, January 28–30, 2016
- Symptom evaluation in reflux disease: workshop background, processes, terminology, recommendations, and discussion outputs
- British Thoracic Society guideline for respiratory management of children with neuromuscular weakness
- Is there such a thing as a life not worth living?
- Portrait of rural emergency departments in Quebec and utilisation of the Quebec Emergency Department Management Guide: a study protocol