Article info
PDFDoctors' authoritarianism in end-of-life treatment decisions. A comparison between Russia, Sweden and Germany
Citation
Doctors' authoritarianism in end-of-life treatment decisions. A comparison between Russia, Sweden and Germany
Publication history
- First published June 1, 2001.
Online issue publication
June 01, 2001
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Copyright 2001 by the Journal of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- Increasing use of DNR orders in the elderly worldwide: whose choice is it?
- Honouring patient's resuscitation wishes: a multiphased effort to improve identification and documentation
- Effect of do-not-resuscitate orders on patients with sepsis in the medical intensive care unit: a retrospective, observational and propensity score-matched study in a tertiary referral hospital in Taiwan
- Evaluation of end of life care in cancer patients at a teaching hospital in Japan
- The do-not-resuscitate order: associations with advance directives, physician specialty and documentation of discussion 15 years after the Patient Self-Determination Act
- Should patient consent be required to write a do not resuscitate order?
- Variation in the design of Do Not Resuscitate orders and other code status options: a multi-institutional qualitative study
- End-of-life care in Toronto neonatal intensive care units: challenges for physician trainees
- Physicians’ confidence in discussing do not resuscitate orders with patients and surrogates
- Factors that influence decisions about cardiopulmonary resuscitation: the views of doctors and medical students