Article info
At the coalface: medical ethics in practice
Randomised clinical trials: a source of ethical dilemmas
Citation
Randomised clinical trials: a source of ethical dilemmas
Publication history
- First published June 1, 2001.
Online issue publication
June 01, 2001
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Copyright 2001 by the Journal of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- In-hospital time to treatment of patients with acute ST elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary angioplasty: determinants and outcome. Results from the registry of percutaneous coronary interventions in acute myocardial infarction of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Leitender Kardiologischer Krankenhausärzte
- Transferring patients for primary angioplasty: a retrospective analysis of 104 selected high risk patients with acute myocardial infarction
- Acute coronary syndrome: ST segment elevation myocardial infarction
- One year clinical follow up of paclitaxel eluting stents for acute myocardial infarction compared with sirolimus eluting stents
- Long term outcome and cost-effectiveness of stenting versus balloon angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction
- ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION: REPERFUSION TREATMENT
- Spectrum of reperfusion strategies and factors influencing the use of primary angioplasty in patients with acute myocardial infarction admitted to hospitals with the facilities to perform primary angioplasty
- Prediction of sudden arrhythmic death following acute myocardial infarction
- Thrombolysis or primary angioplasty? Reperfusion therapy for myocardial infarction in the UK
- Acute myocardial infarction: primary angioplasty