Article Text
Abstract
Objectives—To assess perceptions of the informed consent process in patients undergoing urgent abdominal surgery.
Design—A prospective observational study was carried out using structured questionnaire-based interviews. Patients who had undergone urgent abdominal surgery were interviewed in the postoperative period to ascertain their perceptions of the informed consent process. Replies were compared to responses obtained from a control group undergoing elective surgery, to identify factors common to the surgical process and those specific to urgent surgery. Patients' perceptions of received information were also compared to the information perceived to have been provided by the consent obtainers.
Setting—Gastrointestinal surgical service of a university teaching hospital.
Patients—Seventy-four consecutive patients undergoing urgent abdominal surgery and 80 control patients undergoing elective surgery.
Main measurements—Principal outcome measures were patients' perceptions of factors interfering with the ability to give informed consent, assessment of the quality of informed consent and the degree of discussion of the expected outcomes.
Results—Forty-nine of the seventy-four (66%) patients undergoing urgent surgery perceived that pain did not affect their ability to give informed consent. Twenty-seven reported an adverse effect of analgesia on the ability to give informed consent. Only 22% of patients undergoing urgent surgery perceived that there had been any discussion of potential side effects and complications of surgery.
Conclusion–The majority of patients in this series with acute intra-abdominal surgical conditions perceive that they retain the ability to give informed consent for surgery. There is a need for improved discussion of therapeutic options and likely outcomes.
- Informed consent
- urgent abdominal surgery
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
-
R Kay MB, ChB, is a House Officer at the University Department of Surgery, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh. A K Siriwardena MD, FRCS, is a Consultant Surgeon at the Department of Surgery, Manchester Royal Infirmary.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Goal-directed fluid therapy in urgent GAstrointestinal Surgery—study protocol for A Randomised multicentre Trial: The GAS-ART trial
- Is informed consent effective in trauma patients?
- Anaesthesia and the cardiac patient: the patient versus the procedure
- Are predominantly western standards and expectations of informed consent in surgery applicable to all? A qualitative study in a tertiary care hospital in Sri Lanka
- Timing of surgery in infective endocarditis
- Patient journey following lumbar discectomy surgery: protocol for a single-centre qualitative analysis of the patient rehabilitation experience (DiscJourn)
- Consent with complications in mind
- Discussing surgical innovation with patients: a qualitative study of surgeons’ and governance representatives’ views
- Risks of elective cardiac surgery: what do patients want to know?
- Early and long-term outcomes of conventional and valve-sparing aortic root replacement