Responses
Editorial 1
Future directions of the journal
Compose a Response to This Article
Other responses
Jump to comment:
- Published on: 18 May 2017
- Published on: 18 May 2017PNAJ: please, no abbreviations in JournalShow More
Sir,
Could I make a request of the newly installed editor, whose first editorial is titled 'Future directions of the journal'? A direction I would not wish to see is towards more and more abbreviations. They serve little purpose other than to save printer's ink. [1] Looking through volume 27, issue 3, there are a number of abbreviations better replaced by the parent phrase or a contraction of it. Embryonic and f...
Conflict of Interest:
None declared.
Other content recommended for you
- Empirical research in bioethical journals. A quantitative analysis
- How medical students learn ethics: an online log of their learning experiences
- The formative years: medical ethics comes of age
- A new structure for the Journal of Medical Ethics
- The quality of bioethics debate: implications for clinical ethics committees
- Medical ethics and law for doctors of tomorrow: the 1998 Consensus Statement updated
- Teaching and assessing medical ethics: where are we now?
- Ethics by opinion poll? The functions of attitudes research for normative deliberations in medical ethics
- Authorship policies of bioethics journals
- Problems and development strategies for research ethics committees in China’s higher education institutions