Article info
PDFDeciding for imperilled newborns: medical authority or parental autonomy?
Citation
Deciding for imperilled newborns: medical authority or parental autonomy?
Publication history
- First published April 1, 2001.
Online issue publication
April 01, 2001
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Copyright 2001 by the Journal of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- End-of-life decision-making for newborns: a 12-year experience in Hong Kong
- Withholding and withdrawing of life sustaining treatment in the newborn
- Perceived role in end-of-life decision making in the NICU affects long-term parental grief response
- ‘Best interests’ in paediatric intensive care: an empirical ethics study
- The outcome of treatment limitation discussions in newborns with brain injury
- Ethically complex decisions in the neonatal intensive care unit: impact of the new French legislation on attitudes and practices of physicians and nurses
- Short-term outcome of treatment limitation discussions for newborn infants, a multicentre prospective observational cohort study
- How factual do we want the facts? Criteria for a critical appraisal of empirical research for use in ethics
- Parental experience of interaction with healthcare professionals during their infant’s stay in the neonatal intensive care unit
- Parental views on attending neonatal intensive care ward rounds