Article Text
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Scott B Rae and Paul M Cox, Grand Rapids, Michigan and Cambridge, UK, Eerdmans, 1999, x + 326 pages, $24.00/£15.99.
In a morally pluralist, or in Alasdair MacIntyre's terms “morally fragmented”, society it seems almost inevitable that people engaging with issues of bioethics should operate within something like John Rawls's idea of an “overlapping consensus”—the area in which there is broad agreement between people with different comprehensive worldviews, and in which they are able and willing to operate with the shared criteria of what Rawls calls “public reason”. There are, of course, those who are uneasy about this approach, usually because they see moral fragmentation as being more pervasive and consensus more difficult to achieve, than the Rawlsians believe. From opposite wings Alasdair MacIntyre and Tristram Engelhardt join forces to question the viability of the liberal consensus.
There are, of course, problems with an overlapping consensus. People with religious convictions often feel that …
Request Permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information:
Other content recommended for you
- Responding to religious patients: why physicians have no business doing theology
- Religion 's place at the table of ‘ secular ’ medical ethics: a response to the commentaries
- On the univocity of rationality: a response to Nigel Biggar ’s ‘ Why religion deserves a place in secular medicine ’
- Death - whose decision? Euthanasia and the terminally ill
- Doing good medical ethics: a Christian perspective
- Doing theology in medical decision - making
- Public reason ’s private roles: legitimising disengagement from religious patients and managing physician trauma
- Public reason and the limited right to conscientious objection: a response to Magelssen
- Legitimacy in bioethics: challenging the orthodoxy
- The importance of prudence within inclusive bioethics