Article Text
Statistics from Altmetric.com
SIR
There are some important flaws in Michael Ardagh's reasoning.1
1. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is a “blanket term” for different interventions. Curative and supportive treatments have different ethical contexts and cannot be discussed at the same level. It is imperative to ascribe curative interventions within CPR (defibrillation, pneumothorax drainage, etc) the same status as any other curative intervention, such as antibiotics for infections or surgery for appendicitis. Then we will be able to discuss the ethical context of purely supportive measures such as chest compressions. To address the “ethics of CPR” is a dangerous misnomer.
The preferences of emergency personnel2 suggest the willingness to undergo curative interventions early during CPR, but not protracted supportive interventions. Conversely, withholding curative interventions during CPR should only be considered when any curative treatments would also be withheld.
2. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation is performed to offer the patient a benefit. However, CPR as a whole is only marginally effective. …
Linked Articles
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Family presence during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: who should decide?
- Relational ethical approaches to the COVID-19 pandemic
- Making decisions to limit treatment in life-limiting and life-threatening conditions in children: a framework for practice
- Ethical issues of resuscitation: an American perspective
- To what extent should older patients be included in decisions regarding their resuscitation status?
- Is there a place for CPR and sustained physiological support in brain-dead non-donors?
- Family members, ambulance clinicians and attempting CPR in the community: the ethical and legal imperative to reach collaborative consensus at speed
- The decision making process regarding the withdrawal or withholding of potential life-saving treatments in a children's hospital
- Increasing use of DNR orders in the elderly worldwide: whose choice is it?
- Physicians’s reports on the impact of living wills at the end of life in Japan