Article info
PDFNeonatal euthanasia: moral considerations and criminal liability
Citation
Neonatal euthanasia: moral considerations and criminal liability
Publication history
- First published February 1, 2001.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Copyright 2001 by the Journal of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- A case for justified non-voluntary active euthanasia: exploring the ethics of the Groningen Protocol
- Passive euthanasia
- Attitudes towards euthanasia in Iran: the role of altruism
- Life support and euthanasia, a perspective on Shaw's new perspective
- Euthanasia, Ethics and Public Policy. An Argument Against Legislation
- Assisted suicide and the killing of people? Maybe. Physician-assisted suicide and the killing of patients? No: the rejection of Shaw's new perspective on euthanasia
- Comparison of attitudes towards five end-of-life care interventions (active pain control, withdrawal of futile life-sustaining treatment, passive euthanasia, active euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide): a multicentred cross-sectional survey of Korean patients with cancer, their family caregivers, physicians and the general Korean population
- African vital force and the permissibility of euthanasia
- Causal authorship and the equality principle: a defence of the acts/omissions distinction in euthanasia
- The ethics of killing and letting die: active and passive euthanasia