Article Text
Debate
An argument for intolerance
Abstract
“Multiculturalism”, “pluralism” and “tolerance” have become buzz words in applied ethics. While serious and well thought out work is going on in these areas, a misunderstanding of the importance of tolerance, and the difficulties raised by multicultural moral conflict seems common. In this paper I argue that intolerance of some cultural traditions is morally required, and suggest that the forging of a moral mono-culture is preferable to pluralism.
- Pluralism
- multicultural
- tolerance
- relativism
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
-
John F Catherwood, MA, PhD (Belf), is Lecturer in Applied Ethics, The School of Philosophical Studies, The Queen's University of Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- A little toleration, please
- Bioethics and multiculturalism: nuancing the discussion
- In defence of moral imperialism: four equal and universal prima facie principles
- African perspectives of moral status: a framework for evaluating global bioethical issues
- Ethics needs principles—four can encompass the rest—and respect for autonomy should be “first among equals”
- Comments on Durante’s account of multiculturalism
- The transformation of (bio)ethics expertise in a world of ethical pluralism
- Authoritarian versus responsive communitarian bioethics
- Bioethics and the value of disagreement
- Genetic enhancement, post-persons and moral status: a reply to Buchanan