Article info
PDFRandomisation and resource allocation: a missed opportunity for evaluating health care and social interventions
Citation
Randomisation and resource allocation: a missed opportunity for evaluating health care and social interventions
Publication history
- First published October 1, 2000.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Copyright 2000 by the Journal of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- Rationing, randomising, and researching in health care provision
- Supporting positive experiences and sustained participation in clinical trials: looking beyond information provision
- Dilemmas in undertaking research in paediatric intensive care
- Randomisation in trials: do potential trial participants understand it and find it acceptable?
- Hughes Abdominal Repair Trial (HART)—abdominal wall closure techniques to reduce the incidence of incisional hernias: feasibility trial for a multicentre, pragmatic, randomised controlled trial
- “I don’t like that, it’s tricking people too much…”: acute informed consent to participation in a trial of thrombolysis for stroke
- Attitudes towards clinical research among cancer trial participants and non-participants: an interview study using a Grounded Theory approach
- OPtimising Treatment for MIld Systolic hypertension in the Elderly (OPTiMISE): protocol for a randomised controlled non-inferiority trial
- ‘It's trying to manage the work’: a qualitative evaluation of recruitment processes within a UK multicentre trial
- A health-education intervention to improve outcomes for children with emotional and behavioural difficulties: protocol for a pilot cluster randomised controlled trial