Refusal of potentially life-saving blood transfusions by Jehovah's Witnesses: should doctors explain that not all JWs think it's religiously required?
Download to a citation manager
Download the citation for this article by clicking on one of the following citation managers:
- Cite this article as:
- Refusal of potentially life-saving blood transfusions by Jehovah's Witnesses: should doctors explain that not all JWs think it's religiously required?
Other content recommended for you
- Juggling law, ethics, and intuition: practical answers to awkward questions
- Medical confidentiality and the protection of Jehovah's Witnesses' autonomous refusal of blood
- Jehovah's Witnesses and autonomy: honouring the refusal of blood transfusions
- Why some Jehovah's Witnesses accept blood and conscientiously reject official Watchtower Society blood policy
- Methods and principles in biomedical ethics
- Bioethical aspects of the recent changes in the policy of refusal of blood by Jehovah's Witnesses
- Children of Jehovah’s Witnesses and adolescent Jehovah’s Witnesses: what are their rights?
- Adolescent autonomy revisited: clinicians need clearer guidance
- The problem of ‘thick in status, thin in content’ in Beauchamp and Childress' principlism
- Jehovah’s Witnesses in the emergency department: what are their rights?