Article Text
Filler
Children, Families, and Health Care Decision-making
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Lainie Friedman Ross, New York, Oxford University Press, 1998, 197 pages, £30.
Over recent years in the UK there has been increasing emphasis placed on children taking responsibility for what happens to them. This American publication offers a refreshingly different view of parental and family autonomy and advocates a model of constrained parental autonomy. Ross argues that giving children rights equivalent to those of adults is “to deny them the protection they need” and render them “even more vulnerable than they presently are”. Her thesis is that whilst children should be included in the decision making process, parents should be responsible for …
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Applying the four principles
- Assent as an ethical imperative in the treatment of ADHD
- Neonatal organ donation: has the time come?
- What are parents' perspectives on psychological empowerment in the MMR vaccination decision? A focus group study
- Medical ethics for children: applying the four principles to paediatrics
- Infant circumcision: the last stand for the dead dogma of parental (sovereignal) rights
- Ethics of refusing parental requests to withhold or withdraw treatment from their premature baby
- Worth living or worth dying? The views of the general public about allowing disabled children to die
- Deferred consent for delivery room studies: the providers’ perspective
- Information and consent for newborn screening: practices and attitudes of service providers