Article info
PDFChoices without reasons: citizens' juries and policy evaluation
Citation
Choices without reasons: citizens' juries and policy evaluation
Publication history
- First published August 1, 2000.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Copyright 2000 by the Journal of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- Should free-text data in electronic medical records be shared for research? A citizens’ jury study in the UK
- “No decisions about us without us”? Individual healthcare rationing in a fiscal ice age
- How a deliberative approach includes women in the decisions of screening mammography: a citizens' jury feasibility study in Andalusia, Spain
- Deliberative democracy and cancer screening consent: a randomised control trial of the effect of a community jury on men's knowledge about and intentions to participate in PSA screening
- Ethical arguments for access to abortion services in the Republic of Ireland: recent developments in the public discourse
- Putting the public at the heart of the NHS
- Public good, personal privacy: a citizens' deliberation about using medical information for pharmacoepidemiological research
- The rationing debate: Central government should have a greater role in rationing decisions – The case for
- A politics of health glossary
- Process and consensus: ethical decision-making in the infertility clinic—a qualitative study