Article Text
Statistics from Altmetric.com
sir
Dr Campbell presents proponents of euthanasia with a dilemma.1 Only voluntary euthanasia is permissible; involuntary euthanasia is always impermissible. The question of allowing euthanasia arises most frequently when patients are terminally ill and experiencing great pain. But in these cases, he argues, if patients request euthanasia, their decision “is not freely chosen but is compelled by the pain”.2 It is easy to exaggerate the problem here; patients may have periods when they are pain-free and affirm repeatedly their desire that death be hastened. Putting this aside, however, what should we conclude if euthanasia performed on patients who are suffering greatly is not voluntary?
Dr Campbell concludes: “If the request to end one's life is not made freely, then it is doubtful that such requests ought to be followed”.2 An advance directive will not help, we are …
Linked Articles
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- A case for justified non-voluntary active euthanasia: exploring the ethics of the Groningen Protocol
- Mr Marty’s muddle: a superficial and selective case for euthanasia in Europe
- African vital force and the permissibility of euthanasia
- Medical murder in Belgium and the Netherlands
- The acceptability of ending a patient’s life
- Passive euthanasia
- What people close to death say about euthanasia and assisted suicide: a qualitative study
- Infanticide: a reply to Giubilini and Minerva
- First prosecution of a Dutch doctor since the Euthanasia Act of 2002: what does the verdict mean?
- Australian pharmacists’ perspectives on physician-assisted suicide (PAS): thematic analysis of semistructured interviews