Article Text
Abstract
Is there such a thing as a social conception of disability? Recently two writers in this journal have suggested not only that there is a coherent social conception of disability but that all non-social conceptions, or “medical models” of disability are fatally flawed. One serious and worrying dimension of their claims is that once the social dimensions of disability have been resolved no seriously “disabling” features remain. This paper examines and rejects conceptions of disability based on social factors but notes that physical and mental conditions which disadvantage the individual have social dimensions.
- Disability
- handicap
- impairment
- social deprivation
- social exclusion
- discrimination
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
-
John Harris is Sir David Alliance Professor of Bioethics and Research Director of The Centre For Social Ethics & Policy, University of Manchester and a Director of The Institute of Medicine, Law and Bioethics.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Disability, gene therapy and eugenics - a challenge to John Harris
- Disability and narrative: new directions for medicine and the medical humanities
- Graphic illustration of impairment: science fiction, Transmetropolitan and the social model of disability
- Disability and difference: balancing social and physical constructions
- Enhancement, disability and the riddle of the relevant circumstances
- Philosophy meets disability
- Human-centred design, disability and bioethics
- Making space for disability studies within a structurally competent medical curriculum: reflections on long Covid
- One principle and three fallacies of disability studies
- From assistive to enhancing technology: should the treatment-enhancement distinction apply to future assistive and augmenting technologies?