Article Text
Filler
When Doctors Say No. The Battleground of Medical Futility
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Susan B Rubin, Bloomington, Indiana, Indiana University Press, 1998, 191 pages, US$24.95.
This book is a polemical monograph. It aims to demonstrate that “physicians would not be justified in refusing unilaterally to offer, provide, or continue treatment based on their opinion that the treatment in question would be futile”.
Expressed in these terms, the central thesis of the book may sound unrealistic or even absurd to many busy practising doctors. Is this then just another piece of doctor bashing by an armchair philosopher? Even the title sounds ominous.
In fact Rubin's thesis is more complex. For, as usual in futility debates, it all depends on what you mean by futility. After an introductory first chapter that sets the scene with a description of some publicly prominent cases and …
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- The development of “medical futility”: towards a procedural approach based on the role of the medical profession
- Medical futility at the end of life: the perspectives of intensive care and palliative care clinicians
- Should patient consent be required to write a do not resuscitate order?
- Conditions and consequences of medical futility—from a literature review to a clinical model
- Bereaved families’ experiences of end-of-life decision making for general medicine patients
- Medical futility: a conceptual model
- Perceptions of patients on the utility or futility of end-of-life treatment
- Association of medical futility with do-not-resuscitate (DNR) code status in hospitalised patients
- Ethics and decision making in end stage lung disease
- Identifying futility in a paediatric critical care setting: a prospective observational study