Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
At a recent health authority meeting Professor Stacey, the NHSE Head of Research Ethics, was quoted as stating that for multicentre trials rapid responses were required from Local Research Ethics Committees “and so the decisions on the majority of these studies cannot be made at full monthly meetings of the committee”.1 Professor Stacey has stated that each decision could be made by two members of the committee with delegated powers who could discuss it over the telephone.
This seems to have a substantial impact upon the democratic process and one wonders about the ethical validity of the decisions coming out of a process in which the majority are required to be made by two members, following telephone discussions. Perhaps your readers might wish to comment - particularly if they share my concern.
Other content recommended for you
- The experiences of ethics committee members: contradictions between individuals and committees
- New governance arrangements for research ethics committees: is facilitating research achieved at the cost of participants’ interest
- Meeting the challenges facing research ethics committees: some practical suggestions
- Different views on ethics: how animal ethics is situated in a committee culture
- Ethics behind closed doors: do research ethics committees need secrecy?
- Ethical approval for research involving geographically dispersed subjects: unsuitability of the UK MREC/LREC system and relevance to uncommon genetic disorders
- Clinical ethics support services in the UK: an investigation of the current provision of ethics support to health professionals in the UK
- Should research ethics committees meet in public?
- Applying for ethical approval for research in the United Kingdom
- Electronic communication in ethics committees: experience and challenges