Article Text
Abstract
Objective—To explore the opinions of unpaid healthy volunteers on the payment of research subjects.
Design—Prospective cohort.
Setting—Southern Alberta, Canada.
Participants—Medically eligible persons responding to recruiting advertisements for a randomised vaccine trial were invited to take part in a study of informed consent at the point at which they formally consented or refused trial participation. Of 72 invited, 67 (62 trial consenters, 5 trial refusers) returned questionnaires at baseline and 54 at follow-up.
Outcome measures—Proportions of persons who agreed or disagreed with three close-ended statements on the payment of research subjects; themes and categories identified by content analysis of responses to an open-ended question.
Results—A minority (43.3%) agreed with paying either patient or healthy volunteer participants. Opinions did not change over time. Participants' comments addressed: benefits and drawbacks to research participation; benefits and drawbacks to paying research participants; conditions under which payment of research subjects would be acceptable, and the nature of acceptable recognition. Acceptable conditions were to improve problematic recruitment, to reimburse costs, and to recognise participants, particularly for their time investment. Both non-monetary and monetary recognition of volunteers were thought to be appropriate.
Conclusions—Most unpaid volunteers disagreed with paying research participants. The themes arising from their comments are similar to those that have been raised by ethicists and suggest that recognising the time and effort of participants should receive greater emphasis than presently occurs. (Journal of Medical Ethics 2000;26:126–130)
- Ethics, medical
- human experimentation
- clinical trials
- voluntary workers
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- The influence of risk and monetary payment on the research participation decision making process
- Payment of research participants: current practice and policies of Irish research ethics committees
- What makes clinical labour different? The case of human guinea pigging
- Collection, storage and use of blood samples for future research: views of Egyptian patients expressed in a cross-sectional survey
- Should patients be allowed to veto their participation in clinical research?
- Community based trials and informed consent in rural north India
- Scientific research is a moral duty
- What determines whether patients are willing to participate in resuscitation studies requiring exception from informed consent?
- What does ‘respect for persons’ require? Attitudes and reported practices of genetics researchers in informing research participants about research
- “Fair’s fair argument” and voluntarism in clinical research: But, is it fair?