Article info
PDFReply
The ethics of anonymised HIV testing of pregnant women: a reappraisal
Citation
The ethics of anonymised HIV testing of pregnant women: a reappraisal
Publication history
- First published February 1, 2000.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Copyright 2000 by the Journal of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- The ethics of anonymised HIV testing of pregnant women: a reappraisal
- HIV criminal prosecutions and public health: an examination of the empirical research
- Extent and selectivity of sexual orientation disclosure and its association with HIV and other STI testing patterns among gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men
- Epidemiological factors associated with the absence of previous HIV testing among HIV-positive persons in Singapore, 2012–2017
- The ethics of unlinked anonymous testing of blood: views from in-depth interviews with key informants in four countries
- Uptake and acceptability of antenatal HIV testing: randomised controlled trial of different methods of offering the test
- Unlinked anonymous HIV study of hospital patients and general practice attenders in Glasgow, 1991–1997
- The impossibility of informed consent?
- Aiming towards “moral equilibrium”: health care professionals’ views on working within the morally contested field of antenatal screening
- After 50 years of legal abortion in Great Britain, calls grow for further liberalisation