Article info
PDFCommentary
The ethics of anonymised HIV testing of pregnant women: a reappraisal
Citation
The ethics of anonymised HIV testing of pregnant women: a reappraisal
Publication history
- First published February 1, 2000.
Online issue publication
February 01, 2000
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Copyright 2000 by the Journal of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- The ethics of anonymised HIV testing of pregnant women: a reappraisal
- The ethics of unlinked anonymous testing of blood: views from in-depth interviews with key informants in four countries
- Retrospective hepatitis C seroprevalence screening in the antenatal setting—should we be screening antenatal women?
- Uptake, outcomes, and costs of implementing non-invasive prenatal testing for Down’s syndrome into NHS maternity care: prospective cohort study in eight diverse maternity units
- Cost-effectiveness of a repeat HIV test in pregnancy in India
- Trends in antenatal HIV prevalence in urban Uganda associated with uptake of preventive sexual behaviour
- Factors affecting uptake of antenatal HIV testing in London: results of a multicentre study
- Recent trends in HIV and other STIs in the United Kingdom: data to the end of 2002
- From exceptionalism to normalisation: a reappraisal of attitudes and practice around HIV testing
- Routine antenatal HIV testing: the responses and perceptions of pregnant women and the viability of informed consent. A qualitative study