Article info
The ethics of anonymised HIV testing of pregnant women: a reappraisal
Citation
The ethics of anonymised HIV testing of pregnant women: a reappraisal
Publication history
- First published February 1, 2000.
Online issue publication
February 01, 2000
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Copyright 2000 by the Journal of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- The ethics of unlinked anonymous testing of blood: views from in-depth interviews with key informants in four countries
- Health and medical professionals’ antenatal HIV testing practices and perceived barriers to routine testing in Tasmania, Australia: a qualitative study
- Infant HIV infection despite “universal” antenatal testing
- Should pregnant women with unknown HIV status be offered rapid HIV testing in labour?
- Trends in HIV testing in the UK primary care setting: a 15-year retrospective cohort study from 2000 to 2015
- An AIDS lexicon
- Routine antenatal HIV testing and informed consent: an unworkable marriage? i
- Antenatal HIV testing
- Routine antenatal HIV testing: the responses and perceptions of pregnant women and the viability of informed consent. A qualitative study
- Reducing vertical transmission of HIV in the UK