Modern medicine is increasingly aware of the significance of patient autonomy in making treatment choices. This would seem to be particularly important where the therapy requested was "voluntary" as in fertility treatment or cosmetic surgery. However, the Hippocratic doctrine "Primum non nocere", seems especially relevant where the treatment sought may have a low chance of a successful outcome or even be life-threatening. Mrs A's case demonstrates the difficulty faced by the physician who wants to maximise her patient's autonomy, but "Above all, do no harm".
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Other content recommended for you
- Is it ethical to provide IVF add-ons when there is no evidence of a benefit if the patient requests it?
- Apotemnophilia: ethical considerations of amputating a healthy limb
- Prophylactic interventions on children: balancing human rights with public health
- Southern Regional Meeting Abstracts
- Cosmetic surgery and conscientious objection
- TripAdvisor for fertility clinics
- Changes to bodily appearance: the aesthetics of deliberate intervention
- Disfigured anatomies and imperfect analogies: body integrity identity disorder and the supposed right to self-demanded amputation of healthy body parts
- Three arguments against prescription requirements
- Voluntary sterilisation of young childless women: not so fast