In her commentary, Alderson makes four major criticisms of the family rule. She claims that: consent must be explicit; that consenting parties should be reasonably equal; that the concept of a family rule adds little to current understanding, and that the effect of applying the concept in practice will be to impair the consenting process. However, there are other important examples of implicit consent in daily life, and consent between unequals is common and unexceptionable. The family rule establishes an unequivocal ethical base for the role of children, parents and practitioners in the consenting process, which is sorely needed. This base structures practitioners' interventions towards children in an appropriately empowering manner. Therefore, Alderson's critical objections fail.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Other content recommended for you
- The best interest standard and children: clarifying a concept and responding to its critics
- Research with children and young people: not on them
- Children’s consent and paediatric research: is it appropriate for healthy children to be the decision-makers in clinical research?
- Making decisions to limit treatment in life-limiting and life-threatening conditions in children: a framework for practice
- Assessment of children's capacity to consent for research: a descriptive qualitative study of researchers' practices
- Parents and end-of-life decision-making for their child: roles and responsibilities
- Returning to the Alder Hey report and its reporting: addressing confusions and improving inquiries
- A risky treat: exploring parental perceptions of the barriers to seating their children in the rear seats of passenger vehicles
- ‘Best interests’ in paediatric intensive care: an empirical ethics study
- Charlie Gard: in defence of the law