Article Text
Abstract
Children's consent to treatment remains a contentious topic, with confusing legal precepts and advice. This paper proposes that informed consent in children should be regarded as shared between children and their families, the balance being determined by implicit, developmentally based negotiations between child and parent--a "family rule" for consent. Consistent, operationalized procedures for ethically obtaining consent can be derived from its application to both routine and contentious situations. Therefore, use of the "family Rule" concept can consistently define negligent procedure in obtaining consent from children, and could be used as a unifying framework in the development of new professional guidelines. A "guideline"-based approach to children's consent to treatment may offer greater individuality than a "rights"-based approach, though careful training and oversight will be needed for it to be effective.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Doing challenging research studies in a patient-centred way: a qualitative study to inform a randomised controlled trial in the paediatric emergency care setting
- How parents and practitioners experience research without prior consent (deferred consent) for emergency research involving children with life threatening conditions: a mixed method study
- Consent in children’s intensive care: the voices of the parents of critically ill children and those caring for them
- Assessment of children's capacity to consent for research: a descriptive qualitative study of researchers' practices
- A risky treat: exploring parental perceptions of the barriers to seating their children in the rear seats of passenger vehicles
- Consensus statement on management of intersex disorders
- Commentary on the “Family Rule”
- Assent for children's participation in research is incoherent and wrong
- Making decisions to limit treatment in life-limiting and life-threatening conditions in children: a framework for practice
- Discovering misattributed paternity in genetic counselling: different ethical perspectives in two countries