Of growing concern over Jehovah's Witnesses' (JWs) refusal of blood is the intrusion of the religious organisation into its members' personal decision making about medical care. The organisation currently may apply severe religious sanctions to JWs who opt for certain forms of blood-based treatment. While the doctrine may be maintained as the unchangeable "law of God", the autonomy of individual JW patients could still be protected by the organisation modifying its current policy so that it strictly adheres to the right of privacy regarding personal medical information. The author proposes that the controlling religious organisation adopt a "don't-ask-don't-tell" policy, which assures JWs that they would neither be asked nor compelled to reveal personal medical information, either to one another or to the church organisation. This would relieve patients of the fear of breach of medical confidentiality and ensure a truly autonomous decision on blood-based treatments without fear of organisational control or sanction.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
- Research Article
Other content recommended for you
- Bioethical aspects of the recent changes in the policy of refusal of blood by Jehovah's Witnesses
- Medical confidentiality and the protection of Jehovah's Witnesses' autonomous refusal of blood
- Applying the four principles
- Jehovah's Witnesses and autonomy: honouring the refusal of blood transfusions
- The ethics of policy writing: how should hospitals deal with moral disagreement about controversial medical practices?
- Jehovah’s Witnesses in the emergency department: what are their rights?
- Juggling law, ethics, and intuition: practical answers to awkward questions
- Methods and principles in biomedical ethics
- Principlism and moral dilemmas: a new principle
- Refusal of potentially life-saving blood transfusions by Jehovah's Witnesses: should doctors explain that not all JWs think it's religiously required?