Food refusal occurs for a variety of reasons. It may be used as a political tool, as a method of exercising control over others, at either the individual, family or societal level, or as a method of self-harm, and occasionally it indicates possible mental illness. This article examines the motivation behind hunger strikes in prisoners. It describes the psychiatrist's role in assessment and management of prisoners by referring to case examples. The paper discusses the assessment of an individual's competence to commit suicide by starvation, legal restraints to intervention, practical difficulties and associated ethical dilemmas. Anecdotal evidence suggests that most prisoners who refuse food are motivated by the desire to achieve an end rather than killing themselves, and that hunger-strike secondary to mental illness is uncommon. Although rarely required, the psychiatrist may have an important contribution to make in the management of practical and ethical difficulties.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Other content recommended for you
- The implications of starvation induced psychological changes for the ethical treatment of hunger strikers
- The physician and prison hunger strikes: reflecting on the experience in Turkey
- Ethics briefings
- Hunger striking prisoners: the doctors' dilemma
- Guantanamo force feeding trial: the US is wrong to medicalize hunger striking
- US military medical ethics in the War on Terror
- Garasic review, Guantanamo and other cases of enforced medical treatment
- Ethics briefings
- Hunger strikes
- Force-feeding at Guantanamo