Representatives from eight European countries compared the legal, ethical and professional settings within which decision making for neonates takes place. When it comes to limiting treatment there is general agreement across all countries that overly aggressive treatment is to be discouraged. Nevertheless, strong emphasis has been placed on the need for compassionate care even where cure is not possible. Where a child will die irrespective of medical intervention, there is widespread acceptance of the practice of limiting aggressive treatment or alleviating suffering even if death may be hastened as a result. Where the infant could be saved but the future outlook is bleak there is more debate, but only two countries have tested the courts with such cases. When it comes to the active intentional ending of life, the legal position is standard across Europe; it is prohibited. However, recognising those intractable situations where death may be lingering and unpleasant, Dutch paediatricians have reported that they do sometimes assist babies to die with parental consent. Two cases have been tried through the courts and recent official recommendations have set out standards by which such actions may be assessed.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Other content recommended for you
- Dutch experience of monitoring active ending of life for newborns
- Killing or caring?
- Southern Regional Meeting 2019 New Orleans, LA February 21–23, 2019
- Consent for clinical research in the neonatal intensive care unit: a retrospective survey and a prospective study
- Parents and end of life decisions in neonatal practice
- Circumcision of male infants as a human rights violation
- Ethical dilemmas of recording and reviewing neonatal resuscitation
- Obtaining informed consent for neonatal randomised controlled trials—an “elaborate ritual”?
- The role of the courts in clinical decision making
- Specification and other methods for determining morally relevant facts